
Metis Owned Company Seeking Permit to Mine Gravel in the North Saskatchewan River Valley
Kanata Metis Cultural Enterprises Ltd paid $8 million for a piece of land in the North Saskatchewan River Valley with the intention to create a gravel mine. The parcel sits in the south west corner of the City of Edmonton, and the proposal to put a mine within city limits is drawing opposition.
The Kanata company, owned by Metis settlements in Alberta, wants to mine for four to five years and then turn the location into parkland with an onsite interpretive centre. The proposal states that the mine could bring needed employment and revenue for the First Nations people in that area. The president of the firm, Archie Collins, noted that a good portion of the land has already been scared by off road vehicles.
This proposal is in direct conflict with an amendment to Edmonton’s municipal development plan, which forbids mining in the North Saskatchewan River Valley. The amendment was passed this past September, after the Kanata company’s purchase of the land. Mr. Collins is requesting the development plan be redrafted so that his mining venture can proceed.
The bylaw is awaiting capital region board approval this coming May. No matter their decision, the Kanata company plans to apply for permits to proceed. No doubt the debate between environmental concerns and city land use will continue.
St. Albert to Launch North America’s Largest “Eco City”
A project that is being billed as the largest “eco city” in North America is currently in the planning stages in St. Albert. The community will occupy approximately 135 hectares in recently annexed land, accommodating some 6,000 people at a price of approximately $1.8 billion. The organizations backing this community are Dutch investment company Rampart Avenir Communities, as well as Ener Tech Capital of the U.S. Also participating in the venture is the National Institute for Nanotechnology at the University of Alberta.
David Bromley, director of the project, advises that people will be able to see the results of clean technology by viewing the achievements of this community compared with a marketplace using conventional methods. He contends that there is no equivalent area in North America that showcases complete usage of green technology. Bromley cited the experience of U. of A’s centre for nanotechnology and the Edmonton’s potential for growth as some reasons why St. Albert is the beneficiary of the project.
Area businesses will have the responsibility to develop and implement the green technology. For example, a local builder may be assigned to construct a house that uses zero energy. Rampart Avenir, as well as its associates would provide funding for the residence. If the unit is found to be viable for occupation, more units could be constructed and evaluated by both consumers and researchers. Ultimately, the home could be mass-marketed throughout the world.
The approval process continues with St. Albert’s local government. The site for the eco city, which is located between Carrot Creek and Ray Gibbon Drive, is owned predominantly by Rampart and Melcor.
Heritage Site in St. Albert is Underway
St. Albert’s city council recently authorized construction to begin on phase one of a five-stage heritage site that the city has decided to create. The site will be a heritage-themed park, to be built along Meadowview Drive. The first phase of the project will focus on repairing the city’s historic grain elevators.
The majority of the funds for the cost of the project are included in the city’s 2010 budget plans that will be reviewed for approval in late December, but the council recently approved $295,000 to use in order to begin the first phase.
The city wants to complete the entire project for the celebration of the city’s 150th anniversary, in 2011. Council member Lone Garritty has mentioned about the excitement surrounding the project, and he explains that it is a great accomplishment to finally see the plans become set in action.
The project focuses on the restoration of the two original grain elevators built in St. Albert in 1906 and the 1920s.
The Alberta Wheat Pool Elevator needs repairs to the foundation and crawl spaces to prevent water erosion.
The other elevator, built by the Alberta Grain Company has a slight lean that must be address immediately to ensure the structure’s safety and integrity. The city seems to have planned the project perfectly, securing repair costs that are $16,000 under the modest budget, and the city will be eligible for provincial funding once the projects are complete for the upkeep of city buildings.
These grain elevators are important to Alberta and Canada because they are some of the oldest remaining structures of the sort in the entire region.
Water strategy group seems sunk
A group formed to monitor the Sturgeon River may, itself, be sunk by next month. The Sturgeon Watershed Initiative is one among about 150 groups that came to be after the province declared the Water for Life Strategy, back in 2008.
Apparently, the board of the Sturgeon River Watershed Initiative spent six months attempting to decide what their mission and values should be, but never reached an agreement. The group, I am told, has representatives from six different organizations with conflicting agendas. Things are so bad that the board has called for a special meeting, to see if the water strategy group should disband.
They all seem to agree that they want to protect the Sturgeon River Watershed, which begins east of the Pembina River and continues to a point where it enters the North Saskatchewan River. They simply cannot agree on how to accomplish their mission.
It seems that, within the group, commercial, municipal, and corporate interests have pitted themselves against the environmental issues. The watershed is home to a lot of gravel and sand mining operations. There have been discussions on how to regulate the influence of industry and development pertaining to the conservation of the watershed. Some say, however, that this was never the purview of the organization and that the group was supposed to fulfill more of a planning and strategy role.
Whatever is decided at the special meeting, it is a shame that such a group could not grow into an advocacy role for the Sturgeon River Watershed. There is absolutely a need to manage rivers like the Sturgeon, but if you cannot even decide what the mission of your organization should be after six months of debate, I would suggest that you are pretty much already sunk.


